Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/After the chase

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 23:01, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After the chase

Doesn't seem to meet WP:MUSIC,, sources are questionable. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 21:32, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. At least one of the references is a blog. Another is an editorial that says christian music radio stations won't play their stuff even when it's requested. Drawn Some (talk) 21:51, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 22:46, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, passes WP:MUSIC#C1. In addition to the rated album review already in the article; [1], I found some more here, here and here. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 23:13, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:39, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep if the secondary sources can be improved, otherwise delete. Symplectic Map (talk) 00:59, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 19:32, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.