Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmad Yusuf Abubakar
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:50, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ahmad Yusuf Abubakar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:BLP of a local politician, not properly sourced as passing WP:NPOL #2. The notability claim here is that he's chief executive of a district, which is not an "inherently" notable role that guarantees a Wikipedia article -- politicians at the local level are notable only if you can write a genuinely substantive and well-sourced article that contextualizes their political significance, such as by addressing specific things they did in the job, specific effects they had on the development of the district, etc., and are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because you can minimally source the fact that they exist. Bearcat (talk) 19:08, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 19:08, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 19:08, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Abubakar is not even a district chief executive: he is a municipal chief executive, which is a lower-level position that certainly does not afford inherent notability under WP:NPOL. Since I was unable to find coverage of him that would satisfy the GNG, it seems that he is non-notable. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:35, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.