Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aircrash Confidential

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:27, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aircrash Confidential

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per apparent lack of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Merko (talk) 15:26, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Merko (talk) 15:26, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Someone's been reading my TV cleanup list huh? I found <10 hits on ProQuest, all of which were just TV guide listings. Searches on other databases found nothing constituting a reliable source. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:29, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, even though I won't PROD 200 articles per day a good chunk of that list looks worth deleting at first glance. Great work with the list Merko (talk) 00:30, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.