Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airways (magazine)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 00:09, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Airways (magazine)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relies on primary sources and general failure to meet criteria for WP:GNG LukeWWF (talk) 14:57, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:45, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:45, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:45, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the Australian Aviation source cited [1] is not about and does not mention the magazine in question - there are only a couple of blog-type comments under the article that have a link to an article on the magazine's website.Nigel Ish (talk) 18:51, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV and Wikipedia:Notability (media).4meter4 (talk) 20:23, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.