Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aizawl Khawpui Traffic Jam Hi

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 07:20, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aizawl Khawpui Traffic Jam Hi

[edit]
Aizawl Khawpui Traffic Jam Hi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable unsourced film. I failed to locate significant coverage of reliable sources. Most of the sources found in a Google search are spammy and/or unreliable such as Wiki mirrors and free download websites.

Also nominating the following related pages that were created by one author, for the same reason as above:

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — Zawl 12:59, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Tentative delete all: They are all in desperate need of reliable sources to confirm notability. Reviews by well known publications etc. I'm sure the articles were created in good faith but it is no good just sticking a IMDB or a Youtube link on it (or even nothing at all) and hoping that is enough. If reliable sources are added then great, otherwise delete them. Mattg82 (talk) 22:14, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all. Wow. I agree with Mattg82's assessment - most likely created in good faith, but no indication any of them meet notability criteria. Onel5969 TT me 21:30, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Disagree with mass nominations such as this which includes 33 separate articles as it is asking too much of editors to do thorough searches on all of them. Having said that, I searched on a handfull of them and found nothing reliable. None of them have any reliable sources references so if an editor finds multiple reliable sources for any of them and recreates them with those sources there should be no prejudice against them and G4 should not apply. Atlantic306 (talk) 18:51, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 06:06, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jdcomix (talk) 01:20, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Pacific306 is the same as Atlantic306. They join up around Cape Horn. Thincat (talk) 11:45, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@TheMagnificentist: Thinkitty is right. —usernamekiran(talk) 00:09, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Aizawl_Khawpui_Traffic_Jam_Hi&oldid=1068821885"