Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akshay Sharma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:41, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Akshay Sharma

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The person does not seem to be notable as per WP:ANYBIO WP:AUTHOR. Out of six references two are same references 'Times of India' (whose reliability is itself disputed as per Times of India RFC) describes of winning an award at a non-notable event 'Gurgaon Literature Festival'. Mid-day and Asian Age are a frequent offender of publishing churnalism and disguising it as legitimate journalism. See also this advert here ~ Amkgp 💬 18:23, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 18:23, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 18:23, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Logs: 2020-06 ✍️ create, 2016-09 ✗ A7

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.