Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alberto Borghetti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 05:27, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alberto Borghetti

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPROF. No additional info has been added to this one line stub since its creation in 2017. Article is an orphan and upon trying to expand it, I could not find sources or evidence that it meets WP:NPROF notability. "Guglielmo Marconi" in his professor title is the name attached to the Department, not a named chair. While he does appear to have published many papers and I am admittedly not an expert so cannot judge their impact on the field, the complete lack of additional sources (both in English and Italian) referencing that research as well as the fact that there is no corresponding Italian article for this Italian professor supports lack of notability. Sktai391 (talk) 22:22, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 01:33, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 01:33, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 01:33, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep While this is obviously a stub created from the IEEE list that year, the fact remains that becoming a Fellow of the IEEE is the actual example cited in the notability guideline for meeting WP:NACADEMIC#C3. Archive.org version of cited PDF for verification: [1] Bakazaka (talk) 01:36, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Along with the obvious pass of WP:PROF#C3, I think his Google Scholar profile shows enough citations to his work for #C1. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:46, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by nominator Missed IEEE because it was spelled out in the article. My mistake. It was helpful to have the proper citation, thank you. I've replaced the broken one. Would be great if someone with better understanding of the field could add a few lines highlighting significant contributions since there's very little out there other than academic papers. That would also provide an opportunity to better link and integrate the article. Sktai391 (talk) 10:44, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.