Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleesa Cohene

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 23:22, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aleesa Cohene

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of an artist, resting almost entirely on primary source documentation of her existence rather than reliable source coverage — of the seven citations here, two are to her own website and three are to the descriptions of her work on the websites of galleries where her work has been exhibited. And of the two remaining sources, one is a compilation of interviews, and the last one is a blurb. Any of these sources would be acceptable for some supplementary confirmation of facts after enough reliable source coverage was present to satisfy GNG — but none of them can carry GNG. Delete unless the sourcing can be massively improved. Bearcat (talk) 06:06, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:42, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:42, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now I suppose as although I found links at News, Books , browser and Highbeam. SwisterTwister talk 23:43, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of significant coverage. Given the number of mentions in recent art books, as displayed in Google books, I was surprised not to find magazine articles just about her. It just may be that editor SwisterTwister is correct and it is just WP:TOOSOON. --Bejnar (talk) 06:23, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.