Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Crazenovski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Crazenovski

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication that this individual (or indeed anyone with the name Crazenovski) ever existed in reality. Appears to be a character in a 2010 BBC production, A Passionate Woman. It's unclear whether the page is an intentional hoax or (perhaps more likely) a misinterpretation of the drama's story as factual, but no references can be found to support the article's claims. Calamondin12 (talk) 19:05, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable fictional character, falsely presented as if the person actually lived. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 21:55, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As a non-notable fictional character. Even if he were real he wouldn't be notable, though his fictional wife may stand a chance - Basement12 (T.C) 22:22, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:56, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:56, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:56, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:56, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete bio of fictional character portraying them as factual.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:59, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as only a subject of 1 TV series, nothing else for any applicable notability such as WP:GNG. SwisterTwister talk 04:51, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.