Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Litt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:02, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Litt

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable photographer who fails WP:CREATIVE. The article contains many citations, but little independent coverage. The sources are either produced by Litt, have passing mentions of her, or are interviews that contain no original reporting. The page was declined multiple times at AfC under the title Draft:Alex Litt; pinging reviewers KJP1, Theroadislong, and Praxidicae in case they would like to comment. The article creator likely has a conflict of interest, so WP:TNT also applies. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 18:54, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 18:54, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Moldova-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 18:54, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Article seems to be solely promotional and is lacking in reliable sources, museum collections or critical reviews. Subject of the article does not meet criteria for WP:NARTIST. Netherzone (talk) 21:09, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Promotional article about a non notable individual that fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:CREATIVE. Celestina007 (talk) 08:14, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete -Fails notability guidelines, unable to find substantial independent coverage of this person. ABF992 (talk) 07:37, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - we are not a web host for dog pictures nor a promotional agency for artists, but rather a charity, and in 2019 everybody should know that. We have standards, and this young artist has not won any significant awards nor coverage in reliable sources. It appears to be far too soon for an article on her. Even if she were notable, so much would have to taken out that a complete re-write and coding would be necessary. Bearian (talk) 20:43, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.