Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexandra Bulat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 02:38, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alexandra Bulat

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Semi-advertorialized and poorly sourced WP:BLP of a politician notable only as a local county councillor, with no strong claim to passing either WP:NPOL #2 or any other inclusion standard. As usual, county council is not a level of office that automatically guarantees inclusion in Wikipedia just because she exists, and "first person of this particular not-English-but-still-European ethnic background to do this not otherwise notable thing" does not automatically make her a special case of greater notability than other county councillors in and of itself -- but there's no other properly sourced indication of preexisting notability for other reasons being shown here, as apart from one local news article confirming her election to the county council, this is otherwise referenced entirely to primary sources that are not support for notability at all, such as raw tables of election results and content on the self-published websites of directly affiliated organizations. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to be the subject of a lot more than just one piece of real journalism in real media. Bearcat (talk) 14:08, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:08, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:08, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:56, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:16, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - Going with WK here based on press coverage around her making history as the first Romanian or person of Romanian descent to be named a counselor in the UK. She's been featured in Cambridgeshire Live[1], HotNews[2], Libertatea[3], RFI România [4], NuevoRadici[5], Life.ro[6], Cambridge 105 [7], Adevărul[8] and on Al Jazeera [9], and more. She is also regularly interviewed in the UK as a subject matter expert around youth voting and civic engagement. Missvain (talk) 18:57, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Missvain, a basic search reveals multiyear coverage in RS, notable European activist in context of BREXIT, coverage in both English and Romanian, meets the GNG. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 06:03, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:59, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above, a basic search reveals multiyear coverage in RS, so passes GNG. Jaysonsands (talk) 15:57, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.