Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexandra Fol
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was this AFD smells. If somebody wishes to renominate this in good faith then be my guest. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:48, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Alexandra Fol (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete - Not nearly notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia MrFishy99 (talk) 17:38, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Delete, not notable --173.13.148.1 (talk) 19:15, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not encyclopedia notable --67.180.179.175 (talk) 02:41, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 May 2. Snotbot t • c » 18:00, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:46, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →Στc. 00:33, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Young classical music composer and teacher. The boston.com article is decent, but others all seem to be primary or trivial. If better sourcing can be found, happy to look again. Even if deleted now, could yet become notable, so no prejudice towards article if recreated.--Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 22:38, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I am with withdrawing from participating in this AfD, as I suspect that it is being conducted in bad faith by the nominator--suspected sock puppetry. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 08:31, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.