Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Good Things (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 03:28, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All Good Things (film)

Delete unsourced one-liner about an upcoming film, WP:FILM, WP:CRYSTAL Carlossuarez46 (talk) 20:59, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now, allow for a more content-based entry when more information is known and notability is more established. PabSungenis (talk) 14:54, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete A1, little or no content. Also may be a hoax. Macy (Review me!) 21:13, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- By the way, A1 is context, and A3 is content. Please read WP:CSD thoroughly; there are differences. Thanks, PeterSymonds | talk 21:34, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now, though I'm not comfortable about speedy delete; it's not a hoax by any means. The film is notable in as much as it's an expected film, but at the moment it fails Wikipedia:Notability (films)#Future films, incomplete films, and undistributed films, as no video/trailer has yet been released, and no evidence that the production is notable. No prejudice against recreating when there's more information on actors, budgets and controversies, see WP:Notability (films). PeterSymonds | talk 21:21, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep and expand, source. A number of available sources for citing actors signed onto the film and some of the plot... Per WP:FUTFILM#Notability, references can be added to establish notability - and IMDb status also indicates "Filming" (which hasn't been updated by 14 April, btw). —97198 talk 11:43, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not a Hoax. It is being shot across the street from my residence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tezaster (talk • contribs) 00:32, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:39, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Scientizzle 15:33, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep: If the movie is filming, it no longer violates WP:CRYSTAL. Ravenswing 20:26, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, film may exist, but article has nothing of value. --Kinu ^t/_c 22:21, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:NFF. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 01:50, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no sources, assertion of notability, or anything of the sort. Stifle (talk) 18:43, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I actually feel sorry for this article.-- danntm ^T _C 22:45, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.