Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen Aptekar
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 23:49, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Allen Aptekar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Just seems like a dentist -- and could not find reliable citations for the journal mentioned. Frederick Ding 03:46, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence of notability. No reliable secondary sources. Conflict of interest as he seems to have created an article about himself. Unsourced personal information. CodeTheorist (talk) 22:38, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:49, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The only claim to notability in the article is the claim that he is the founder and editor in chief of the "Journal of Clinical and Practical Oral Implantology". However, that journal does not appear to be a "major well-established academic journal" so it does not provide notability per WP:ACADEMIC. The journal was only founded in 2010 and only comes out quarterly. Google Scholar never heard of it and neither did PubMed. It doesn't even have a presence online - not even a website. Lacking notability through the journal, he appears to be a run-of-the-mill dentist; I'm sure he is very good at what he does, but he does not meet the criteria for a Wikipedia article. --MelanieN (talk) 02:45, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.