Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alliance to Support Islam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:51, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alliance to Support Islam

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG. The only reliable source on the page is Enab Baladi, which doesn't mention the phrase "Alliance to Support Islam". Googling the phrase returns the the Wikipedia page for Guardians of Religion Organization as the highest result because of content added to that article by the creator of this article. ~~Possible WP:HOAX~~. Rosguill^talk 07:40, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Kyle Orton blog [1] does meet RS under WP:SPS. Orton's work has been published in the International Business Times [2] and other reliable publications. [3] David O. Johnson (talk) 08:48, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. However, upon reviewing the content on the Kyle Orton blog, and in the additional source that you added since this was listed for deletion, there isn't any mention of an "Alliance to Support Islam". The Kyle Orton blog refers to an "Alliance for Supporting Islam", and other sources refer to it by its Arabic name, Hilf Nusrat al-Islam. I no longer believe that this is a hoax, but if the result of this AfD is "keep" I would suggest moving the article to rename it per WP:COMMONNAME. As for the deletion discussion, I would like to see what more editors have to say. Sources appear to be reliable, but it's unclear to me whether they are really significant coverage of the alliance, and this article could potentially run afoul of WP:NOTNEWS. Rosguill^talk 01:55, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. —AE (talk • contributions) 09:19, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. —AE (talk • contributions) 09:19, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Syria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:50, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 01:05, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: insufficient reliable sources to justify a stand-alone article. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:12, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It fails GNG. Besides, I don't see any need for this stub (in its current state) to be included in the encyclopedia. Dial911 (talk) 23:33, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.