Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alodia Gosiengfiao (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep per WP:NOTAGAIN, seems to be some sort of crazy push to get this deleted. Ain't gonna happen. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 17:04, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alodia Gosiengfiao

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:BIO and WP:ENT, hardly any third party coverage, sources lacking. [1] LibStar (talk) 04:41, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The sources found by Whpq (talk · contribs) in the previous debate prove that Alodia Gosiengfiao passes WP:BIO. There are this article and this article from The Inquirer. I also found this article from digitalgames.fr. Cunard (talk) 06:39, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Proceedural Keep per WP:NOTAGAIN, last AfD was less than one month ago. 159.182.1.4 (talk) 12:50, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -survived three previosu AfDs with good reason, and also see Cunard. Also, previous noms have been pushed by what seemed single-purpose accounts; there's some kind of agenda to delete this article for reasons unfathomable to me. Not good.--Cycl^opia - ^talk 13:17, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.