Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpha Wolf (pickup truck)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Alpha Wolf (pickup truck) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As this just seems to be a variant of Alpha Wolf (pickup truck), in fact much of the content is already shared. Slatersteven (talk) 17:20, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Slatersteven (talk) 17:20, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
My mistake, its three separate links to the same page. Wolf Wolf+ and SuperWolf, at least this one seems to have had one working model made. Slatersteven (talk) 17:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment as article creator It is unclear to me what your rationale for deleting this article is, even with correcting your mistake. The three articles you linked in your comment lead to two unrelated/unnominated articles and one that does not exist. Waddles 🗩 🖉 18:01, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- As I said I made a mistake as there are three links to the same article under different names, however it seems this car has not started production, and most of the sourcing is to one source. So it may not (in fact) be notable. Slatersteven (talk) 18:04, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- A car which has not yet started production or has never been mass-produced is not non-notable just for those reasons; it's why Wikipedia has so many articles on canceled or concept vehicles. It's about WP:SIGCOV, and there are six independent sources published between March 2021 and August 2023 being cited in the article and many more of them out there. Waddles 🗩 🖉 18:09, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- How many non blog independent sources are there for this? Slatersteven (talk) 18:30, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- In the article, there are six sources cited from non-blog independent automotive news sources from varying dates, which is more than enough to pass significant coverage. Waddles 🗩 🖉 18:35, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- How many non blog independent sources are there for this? Slatersteven (talk) 18:30, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- A car which has not yet started production or has never been mass-produced is not non-notable just for those reasons; it's why Wikipedia has so many articles on canceled or concept vehicles. It's about WP:SIGCOV, and there are six independent sources published between March 2021 and August 2023 being cited in the article and many more of them out there. Waddles 🗩 🖉 18:09, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- As I said I made a mistake as there are three links to the same article under different names, however it seems this car has not started production, and most of the sourcing is to one source. So it may not (in fact) be notable. Slatersteven (talk) 18:04, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - An actual, in-the-metal(is it metal or plastic? anyway-) vehicle that has sufficient sourcing to establish notability. - The Bushranger One ping only 21:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Sourcing used in the article is primary or non-RS, but some turn up [1], [2]. Should be enough for at least a basic article. Oaktree b (talk) 22:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)