Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternative versions of Daredevil
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 06:57, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Alternative versions of Daredevil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article does not meet WP:GNG and WP:BEFORE showed nothing that meets WP:SIGCOV (all fancruft, passing mentions, etc). Article itself is mostly (all) WP:OR based on primary sources. There are no sources that discuss this as a group WP:LISTN that might justify making this into a list. // Timothy :: talk 11:04, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 11:04, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - completely agree with Timothy on this one Spiderone 11:29, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 15:51, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - Same as all the others. It's just a containment article for unnecessary plot that fails to establish itself as an independent topic. TTN (talk) 17:35, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Merge to Daredevil (Marvel Comics character). BOZ (talk) 21:57, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete after merging anything that's salvagable per BOZ. Note: I don't think there is anything but PLOT there, so I don't think we need to wait long for anyone to merge. Save this fancruft now or it will be gone in a week. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:51, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as lacking third party coverage to pass the WP:GNG. Shooterwalker (talk) 16:11, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.