Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Overmyer

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Amanda Overmyer

[edit]

The result was Keep per ThaddeusB. The nominator should really check out the nominated-articles a bit more, seeing as they meet WP:MUSIC 9. Cheers, I'mperator 19:59, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Amanda Overmyer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Delete. After Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexis Grace (2nd nomination) saw a “delete” outcome, I feel that the time has come to determine which of the American Idol contestants truly deserve their own articles. WP:NOTINHERITED tells us that just because somebody appeared on American Idol, it doesn’t make them notable and worthy of an article. This fails WP:MUSIC and WP:BIO. She appears to have released an album, but it did not chart and this violates WP:MUSIC. They’ve done nothing worthy of note since they appeared on American Idol. DJ 12:10, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy close as a (unintentionally) disruptive nomination. The nominator rapid fire nominated 38 American Idol contestants all with the same (invalid) rationale that Alexis Grace (who finished 11th and hasn't had a chance to do anything post Idol yet) was deleted. It is quite clear that he/she made no attempt to research any of the nominations as several quite clearly meet multiple inclusion criteria. Some of these articles should be kept, and others merged, but none should be deleted. All arguably meet WP:MUSIC #9: "Has won or placed in a major music competition" by virtue of making the finals of American Idol and the less notable ones should at least be merged with their respective American Idol season X pages.

This sort of mass nomination is unproductive because it leads to people voting based on "I like it"/"I don't like it" since no one can reasonably be expected to properly research 38 articles of the same nature in a week. (Indeed this has already begun to happen.) Since the results of these AfDs are likely to be influenced by voting rather than a proper discussion, they should all be closed with no prejudice against reopening a few at a time after a good faith attempt to determine notability has been made. --ThaddeusB (talk) 22:40, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy close per ThaddeusB. Jeni (talk) 00:10, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy close per Wikipedia:WikiProject Idol series#Guidelines; the Alexis Grace deletion was improper per that guideline, and this one is even more so. --RBBrittain (talk) 01:47, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy close per ThaddeusB. Crafty (talk) 02:24, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and YoungAmerican. Despite the support of the Idol Wikiproject, subject fails WP:MUSIC and WP:BIO. Lara 19:03, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Note to closing admin, the above vote is a copy and paste vote, pasted across a group of AfDs in such a short space of time that the user could not have adequately checked notability of the subject in question. Jeni (talk) 19:27, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • This is going to be copy/pasted into all of them as well. The nominations should have been made as one AFD with the rest bulleted. That would have saved everyone time. The nominations themselves were good. Not all should be deleted, but they are all BLPs of questionable notability and are, thus, in great need of attention. I looked over every article, and not every one of my votes reads exactly the same and there was at least one keep vote from me. It wasn't time consuming to click to the article, see where they placed and then scroll down to see if they've done anything of note. For the sake of clarity, "placed in a major competition" should be clarified to detail where, exactly, as far as Idol goes. Placing in the top 12 is too broad. Top three or four is reasonable. But that is for another discussion. Lara 08:28, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Speedy keep per WP:NOTE. As American Idol is watched by over 30 million viewers, it seems that top 12 or 13 is not really too broad. The finalists qualify for their own Wikipedia article as long as there is enough non-trivial information. Decimus Tedius Regio Zanarukando (talk) 04:51, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Amanda_Overmyer&oldid=1137557951"