Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amar y Servir Foundation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:12, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Amar y Servir Foundation

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Largely based on related websites. A fundraising organisation is not made notable by the organisations is sponsors. The Banner talk 11:56, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:14, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:14, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:14, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, wumbolo ^^^ 13:45, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:ORGSIG, WP:ORGCRIT and WP:ORGDEPTH. I've been looking at this article for a while and come to the conclusion that there are no significant independent sources that discuss the organisation in depth. The Semana source in the article is a puff piece about collecting money through children's carol singing, while there are a couple of other sources from Spanish newspapers about raising donations abroad for the organisation [1], [2], but none of the three tell you anything much about the organisation itself. All the other sources are from Jesuit-affiliated websites or mere passing mentions. Richard3120 (talk) 16:05, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 15:52, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.