Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ambarish Mitra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Swarm ♠ 20:28, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ambarish Mitra

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

personal / promotional biography. The subject is not Notable MahenSingha (Talk) 15:05, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The biography has been written from a neutral point-of-view. The subject has received coverage by many secondary sources, though only a few were needed to fill the information in the article. Guess it depends on one's definition of "significant". Chcameron (talk) 15:48, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is no sourced statement proving the person to be an outstanding CEO making him so notable. Simply advertising for self or owned company finds no place here on wikipedia.--MahenSingha (Talk) 18:36, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:57, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:57, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:57, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe redirect to Blippar as he's received a lot of coverage for this (such as [Ambarish Mitra this but I'm not sure about independent notability at this time here (fades by page 6) and here. SwisterTwister talk 04:36, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Looks like a self promotion article. The author is SPA for Ambarish Mitra.Sulabhvarshney (talk) 18:33, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:27, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 17:58, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Promotional tone is not serious enough to warrant deletion. Available sources meet WP:SIGCOV. ~Kvng (talk) 17:27, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Seems to get some attention in the media, two of the refs in the article (Sunday Times and Evening Standard) look good. There's also Ambarish Mitra: From runaway teen to tech genius and entrepreneur (DNA India), A Year In A Delhi Slum (Fast Company), European tech: In Silicon Valley’s shadow (Financial Times), a Turkish source, What kind of start-up would refuse to sell for $1.7 billion? Just Blipp it (in Business Today), passes WP:GNG Kraxler (talk) 14:22, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.