Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amdi Petersens Armé

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Valley2city^‽ 18:59, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Amdi Petersens Armé

No sources given to back up the claim of popularity. Sources inserted by the deprodder are trivial and inadequate. Delete. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 16:58, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No sources given to back up the claim of popularity. Sources inserted by the deprodder are trivial and inadequate for further consideration - sorry.

Athos, Porthos, and Aramis (talk) 17:19, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: trivial coverage, non-notable. JamesBurns (talk) 10:09, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:05, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —--Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 14:15, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It's a band from the Danish underground music scene, which has a small, but seemingly devoted fan crowd, loosely related to the small but highly visible anti-globalization, anti-autoritarian, anti-etc European activist movement that in Denmark gravitated around Ungdomshuset. I have checked the first couple of hundred Ghits, including the ones in Danish. Blogs and forums etc. that wont pass WP:V. Band certainly doesn't pass WP:BAND. I would perhaps advise the article creator to write a general article on the underground music scene in Copenhagen, giving passing mention to the band, with the caveat, that even such an article would face long-time survival difficulties on en.wikipedia, precisely because it's a minority fringe grouping, that will have inherent problems with WP:RS. Perhaps it would be better to let such an article incubate a while on the Danish Wikipedia, to test ground for consensus there first. But again, precisely because this subculture largely rejects regular society, it's an uphill struggle to have the subculture's artifacts mentioned in an Encyclopedia, which requires independent third-party coverage by regular society's media. For the same reason Blod Ser Mere Virkeligt Ud På Film, Gorilla Angreb and No Hope for the Kids should go. Hjertestop could perhaps stay, with more sources verifying the claim of EU touring. You should be very selective creating other articles from List of Danish punk bands. Sorry. Power.corrupts (talk) 09:34, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.