Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Varle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:31, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Amy Varle

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG. This Bury Times article appears to be a puff piece, with statements like "Amy Varle is in the market for success". Lots of dead links in the article and in Google News searches. The Guardian article citation doesn't mention her. –Novem Linguae (talk) 16:43, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and United Kingdom. –Novem Linguae (talk) 16:43, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:46, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Important work this person does, but we don't have enough sourcing to build an article. [1] is about all I can pull up; more of a local crusader piece, highlighting great works. I don't see national news coverage, so I don't think we have notability. Oaktree b (talk) 03:02, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep additional references exists: [2], [3], [4], [5]. 84.146.2.66 (talk) 11:02, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Blocked sock. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 21:27, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
source 2 is passing - not significant coverage. All the sources are primary and from local press. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 15:09, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. I have added one ref, but I'm not seeing enough coverage at the national level for this person to be notable. It doesn't help that it's difficult to work out what her initiative, Socially Homes, actually does. Possibly a case of WP:TOOSOON. Tacyarg (talk) 11:15, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.