Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea Shavonne Williams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 12:59, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Andrea Shavonne Williams

Angelina Joli look-alike. Claims of notability but no evidence offered. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 09:58, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete it's a Vanity page, with no refs or evidence to show notability. Page does not even conform to Wiki style or close, so no editor of wiki has been involved in its creaton.--Artypants (talk) 13:14, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. The best bit - References - "Private sources". Private sources???--Artypants (talk) 13:17, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable per our notability criteria. Aecis·(away) ^talk 23:11, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete "Private sources" sums it up. Junk this and try again with more public sources next time. JuJube (talk) 08:55, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I know of Andrea Shavonne Williams on a personal level, not only on her wide-spread level. We were very serious at one point, though I'm not trying to cash in on her notability or fame. I want that noted. I just wanted to add that this article is accurate. I for one can verify the information that the creator of this article has provided is true and accurate. However her Birthday is Nov 1st, the creator neglected to mention that in his description of her, or maybe he didn't know the exact date. I can also add some more personal information to this article if needed. She is a humanitarian, semi-vegan, and her signature scent is Wild Musk and has been since I first met her in 1994. She has many great loves in her life, and the one that I know to be her first and foremost beyond anything else is her youngest brother Lance. However, I will not compromise her private life. Just because I have the pleasure of knowing her on a personal level, I would want to make it CLEARLY understood I would never try to add my name into an article about her due to the fact I feel that if she found out she would feel I was trying to cash in on her so to speak. She is an amazing person, despite her fame, and I would like the world to know that. Some people lose their morals or forget their friends before they take off. She is not one of those persons. This is all I have to add at this time.—Preceding unsigned comment that originally was used to remove all other editors comments was added by Eric19945 (talk • contribs) 09:38, 17 February 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Artypants (talk • contribs) [reply]

As to the persons who remarked on my earier comments and edits to the original editiors publication: I have not openly stated my idenidy due to the fact that I do not wish to look like a fame seeker by telling what I know of her life, nor have her look at me in that light if she was to come across the article. I was just posting what I know of her on a personal level to the authors original work. My name is Eric, however I will give no other information about myself on this public forum.

(((And in responce to User:JuJube|JuJube, I don't think I need to reveal my entire Idenity to help confirm what I know of her life!))) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eric19945 (talk • contribs)

Perhaps not, but you need to reveal some sources, preferably online ones or books that confirm what you're talking about. JuJube (talk) 05:30, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Have done a search with various parameters. Being on Myspace and Facebook, and having youtube videos might show she exists, but does not confer not confirm any notability. And no.... she does not look like Angelina Jolie. While Cleanup could easily adreses the article format, that will not address the inherent problems with WP:BLP. And yes, it does seem the author knows all about her... but no one else does. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:49, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.