Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Grayham Doe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:28, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Grayham Doe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This author doesn't meet the notability guidelines, no significant coverage from reliable sources. He gets zero news archive hits. Article also seems designed to promote his website. Morefoolhim 00:54, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 03:32, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 03:32, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 03:32, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:GNG. The refs are essays and a non-editorial interview.--Nixie9 (talk) 19:07, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Lacks WP:SIGCOV and other notability requirements.Crtew (talk) 20:57, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 02:39, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.