Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew White (English cricketer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 06:05, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew White (English cricketer)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing notable about him. No coverage found. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 20:57, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:59, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:59, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:59, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete another in a very long line of cricket players who fail GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:06, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above and per my reasoning on the similar non-notable cricketers currently up for deletion. RobinCarmody (talk) 18:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails NCRIC due to not having played at the highest domestic level – irrespective of the status afforded matches, those involving minor counties do not meet this standard. More importantly this also fails GNG, with no significant coverage found (only passing mentions – as Andy – in local routine cricket reports, and the usual wide-ranging databases) and no reason to expect that any exists. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 16:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.