Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angad Rawal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 05:52, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Angad Rawal

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet NFOOTY. Sub-majors player who has apparently been a free agent since 2014. More pressingly, via GSearch I wasn't able to find high-enough quality sources to float this as a viable BLP, just stuff like LinkedIn and EverybodyWiki. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 05:51, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 05:51, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 05:51, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 05:51, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

He is a legit player, and all information is true, in Tennessee sports nobody documents things on the internet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OGFudbalski (talk • contribs) 06:01, 4 October 2019 (UTC) http://www.hotstat.com/72194/teams/14103928/11751281-14104026/TEAM.html number 24 from 2009 you can see — Preceding unsigned comment added by OGFudbalski (talk • contribs) 06:03, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OGFudbalski, I understand that, and I don't doubt that the information is true, but merely being true is not enough for inclusion into Wikipedia. If there aren't enough reliable independent secondary sources on a topic it doesn't belong here; this is especially true since Rawal is a living person, biographies on whom Wikipedia is particularly stringent about. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 06:27, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No problems then! It can and will become a page after his surgery is done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OGFudbalski (talk • contribs) 06:31, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds good, provided that he passes our notability guidelines. (Also, for the future, please sign your posts by placing four tildes (like this:"~~~~") at the end of them. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 06:37, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 08:19, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 08:20, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:NFOOTBALL by not having played in a league listed as fully professional or at senior international level, and there's no evidence of any media coverage independent of the subject, let alone enough to pass the general notability guideline. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 08:33, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete On top of WP:NFOOTY/WP:GNG, I'm not convinced this isn't a hoax. SportingFlyer T·C 11:08, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - clear hoax ... 4 national teams? Article and AFD have been subject to excessive vandalism - suggest checking User:OGFudbalski for sock puppetry. Nfitz (talk) 16:34, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:16, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.