Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angel (Meg series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 00:47, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Angel (Meg series)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This articles lacks any proper sources to establish notability, and it seems unlikely that there is any such potential for any. TTN (talk) 19:55, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:10, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:10, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Meg: A Novel of Deep Terror. All four books should be merged to a series article since none are sourced and likely difficult to do so. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 21:01, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Merge A merger seems like a move to consider. The subject doesn't seem to qualify for an article on its own. No independent sources found in a quick search.Jarkeld (talk) 21:13, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Green Cardamom, "All four books ... since none are sources and likely difficult to do so". Technical 13 (talk) 16:12, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:GNG as fancruft. No sourced encyclopedic content to merge. -- Trevj (talk) 10:34, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.