Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animal Room
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 22:02, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Animal Room (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. I found no suitable or reliable sources or reviews to pass WP:NEXIST in a WP:BEFORE and no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. The Film Creator (talk) 23:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:15, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Found this [1] in The Record from New Jersey. DonaldD23 talk to me 00:06, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:51, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 14:59, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- Weak keep was able to add a few sources, not great, but it's something. Artw (talk) 16:31, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.