Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aniqah Choudhri
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Aniqah Choudhri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject does not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline as significant coverage by reliable, independent sources is limited. While Aniqah Choudhri won a notable poetry prize and has some publication credits, the article lacks substantial third-party sources that provide in-depth coverage of her life and career. Ktkvtsh (talk) 23:03, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Journalism, Poetry, and United Kingdom. Ktkvtsh (talk) 23:03, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:21, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete The necessary sources are not there. We get a review in a reader-created, online text; routine announcements by booksellers, such as this; the Tribune "about" page on our subject in her capacity as a journalist in its staff; a couple of articles written by our subject, here and here; and so on. Fails both WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE. -The Gnome (talk) 19:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Passes criteria 4c of WP:NAUTHOR as the recipient of two poetry prizes. That is enough critical attention as an author to pass that WP:SNG criteria in my opinion. Also the verifiability issues are over-stated here, because the non-independent sources being used are doing so in compliance with WP:ABOUTSELF. It would be better to have more independent coverage, but that is not necessary when an SNG is met. 4meter4 (talk) 16:13, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:15, 16 November 2024 (UTC)- 4meter4, poetry prizes are a dime a dozen, as surely you are aware. Winning ten prizes in poetry mean next to nothing if the awards are not important/notable enough. In my neck of the woods, they have monthly competitions in short stories and poetry, but I assure you none of the winners merits a Wikipedia article. End game: Without sources supporting independent notability, we do not have an article. -The Gnome (talk) 11:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:11, 23 November 2024 (UTC)