Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjan Contractor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Both "keep"s are by editors with 30-ish edits, so, yeah, no. Sandstein 19:16, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anjan Contractor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatant self-promotion (see [1] and [[2]]) and ludicrous claims that he "commercialised" 3D printing, as if no-one else was active in the field. Also a significant lack of robust sources that go beyond the slack-news-day junk about 3D-printed pizza to solve food shortages. Andy Dingley (talk) 07:35, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:33, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:33, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as searches simply found nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 22:08, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Will remove "commercialised" which is taken totally out of context, but no need to debate it. Simply will remove it. Will also add all media coverage.3Dnasa (talk) 21:36, 18 March 2016 (UTC) Subject is in a broad spectrum of coverage from Wired on down, all RS, and has made a significant contribution to the field. 3D printing page info was removed and isn't relevant here.3Dnasa (talk) 21:50, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am generally an inclusionist and he may have some notability, however, the close relationship thing bothers me a bit.--Metallurgist (talk) 03:59, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:BIO in general; and as above, advertorial. No indication of much contemporary notability, let alone long-yerm. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 15:53, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep | GNews shows a wealth of RS starting in 2013. Subject is notable. I took a look at the article after a request-- and cut down a few of the adverbs and promo which I see as an actual problem, now flagged. Moresie (talk) 19:59, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.