Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Chiaravallo
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The subject does not meet the notability guidelines for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:44, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Anthony Chiaravallo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested Prod, prod tag deleted by anon IP without comment. There isn't really a claim of notability here. Fails WP:BIO. The claims of being "featured" in WSJ, USA Today, etc., are misleading - Chiaravallo is listed as the publisher of advertising flyers that appeared in those publications, which isn't the same as "being featured" in those publications. The 44 Google hits don't speak to notability, either - it's all facebook, linkedin, ancestry.com, nothing that approaches significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Nothing of note in Google news either. Delete. Dawn Bard (talk) 02:22, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Seems that if we keep this non-notable, then we will also need to create a dab page. Unschool 02:32, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: No reliable sources, no claim to notability. — Bdb484 (talk) 00:17, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. - No evidence of notability. Athanasius • Quicumque vult 14:00, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.