Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antlophobia
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of phobias. MBisanz talk 01:22, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Antlophobia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Yet another WP:DICTDEF phobia with no clinical literature, padded with boilerplate phobia treatment text. Mangoe (talk) 20:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:24, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:27, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:27, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- Merge/Redirect to List of phobias - As with so many others, there doesn't seem to be enough coverage in good enough sources to justify a stand-alone article. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 15:49, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 19:35, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 19:35, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete no significant coverage per WP:MEDRS. Staszek Lem (talk) 21:48, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:56, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as there's no hope there would be a convincing separate article, because, as with all of these, they would simply contain a limited amount of information therefore best simply mentioned at the list altogether. SwisterTwister talk 00:48, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.