Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonio Biaggi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:54, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Antonio Biaggi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominations only so fails pornbio and clearly fails the gng Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:50, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Spartaz ^Humbug! 20:03, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable performer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:34, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Clearly fails WP:PORNBIO with only nominations. Fails to reach GNG threshold. Finnegas (talk) 10:09, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No qualifying awards. No nontrivial reliable sourcing, The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 14:42, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:21, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:21, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete with regrets. He's "bigger" yet not a big star, in his own admission on his blog. Bearian (talk) 13:50, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable pornographic actor.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:20, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.