Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anubha Bhonsle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 21:36, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Anubha Bhonsle

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to meet WP:Notability (people) Boleyn (talk) 18:46, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 20:42, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Wow, a non-notable journalist in India won a non-notable award? — Wylie pedia 16:17, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:24, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable so far. AAA3AAA (talk) 09:50, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I added a few refs. You decide. 24.151.10.165 (talk) 16:15, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 05:04, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relist rationale: See [1], diffs of material added since last delete opinion was registered. --j⚛e decker ^talk 05:05, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There are 2 deletes + the nominator. Does my delete make it any clearer. The 2 awards won by the subject are not notable. The occasional article does not confer notability. Delete, delete, delete. Op47 (talk) 20:10, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.