Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apple.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. I couldn't identify exactly what would be useful to merge into Apple Inc. so I'm leaving that for someone with a better idea; this is a redirect with no deletion, leaving the hisotry intact for any future merge possibilities. — Scientizzle 13:42, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apple.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A separate page for Apple's domain name is simply unnecessary. There's no reason to indicate that their web sites are themselves notable, and this could easily be merged with the main Apple, Inc. article. —fetch ·comms 02:39, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge as a section any relevant info into Apple Inc. I fail to see how this subject qualifies for a separate article, as the nominator said. Airplaneman ✈ 02:53, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge any content not already in apples article. to help solidify the debate, i checked the category American websites, and almost all the ".com" links were redirects to the correct name of the business/organization. only a few exceptions, like, obviously, amazon.com. I think consensus has it: the website is to be part of the article on the main subject unless there is a compelling reason otherwise. apples website is obviously highly notable itself, so a website can be highly notable, but that doesnt mean it gets a separate article.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:05, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per above. HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 03:22, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/redirect — Unlike Google.com, this site itself is not notable. mono 04:05, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect as per above to Apple Inc. - Pmedema (talk)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:29, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect - Not necessary as a separate article. ~NerdyScienceDude (✉ • ✐) 20:59, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect into Apple Inc. No stand-alone notability. --TorriTorri(^talk/_contribs) 00:38, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Apple Inc. No evidence of stand-alone notability, and content is mostly just a directory of URLs that probably doesn't meet WP:EL and is possibly even listcruft. --Closeapple (talk) 14:20, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect or merge. Carrite (talk) 14:56, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.