Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/April 2, 2007 Braves vs. Phillies
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Delete. The A7 criteria is not applicable here; It's not a bio or a band, company, or group - except that the group of two teams with these rosters on this date might be considered a group, but that's an awful stretch. Fortunately, the author has consented to the deletion, below, so G7 works just as well. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 14:01, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- April 2, 2007 Braves vs. Phillies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Notability of a single, early season baseball game is something that I simply cannot see. NuclearWarfare contact meMy work 02:44, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was planning on entering other games, but it's not really working out. Maybe when I'm a little more experience I'll be able to start this project up again. (In other words I concede). -DCnative311
- Speedy delete There are already respective pages for the teams' 2007 baseball seasons. IRK!Leave me a note or two 03:07, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This kind of thing is why retrosheet.org exists. Useful info, but not what Wikipedia is for. Townlake (talk) 03:27, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete unless its an incredibly famous game, they should not have individual articles. Monster Under Your Bed (talk) 05:42, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete no assertion of importance/significance. Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:01, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Thirty MLB franchises, 162 games involving two teams each --> 2,430 regular season games just in 2007 alone. This is a horrible idea. Mandsford (talk) 12:57, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. Absolutely nothing to suggest that this is independently notable. Save for the day someone creates an MLB Wikia site. 23skidoo (talk) 13:02, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Sorry, not notable, doesn't give any reason why this is notable enough to sustain an article. It's getting cold in here, is it not? Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 13:26, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete under A7 and so tagged and author warned. SpecialK 13:54, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.