Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arcanists

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:39, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Arcanists

This article does not cite any sources, and is orphaned in the way of links from other articles. It isn't really notable enough to warrant having a seperate article of its own, however parts of the article could be merged with the FunOrb article. ۩ Dracion ۩ ✎ ✉ 15:51, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No asserion of notability. TrulyBlue (talk) 17:18, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. Nifboy (talk) 17:39, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — No notability as well as meeting WP:ADVERT; this is written very much like an advertisement, which has no place here. MuZemike (talk) 17:48, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Even RuneScape is struggling with a lack of in-depth reviews, despite being a very significant online game. There is no way this single game on FunOrb is going to garner non-trivial coverage from reliable sources - non-notable. A search turns up nothing but personal blogs and fansites. Would oppose a merge - Arcanists is one of umpteen games currently on FunOrb, the number will increase month-on-month, there is no way to cover each individual game properly or equally - readers will have to go to the primary source and read the online documentation, that's what it's there for. Someone another 22:55, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - could have been speedied as nn web content. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:09, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per others. No assertion of notability via significant coverage in reliable sources. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 19:29, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep or at worst Redirect to Funorb It's the most popular game on Funorb, so it should at least be mentioned on that article or have it's own page. 76.212.15.113 (talk) 03:58, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This does not seem notable for wikipedia. Belongs on funorb wikia. We could add one line descriptions to the table on the Funorb article. Ultra two (talk) 08:51, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.