Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ArchiveConnect

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 10:29, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArchiveConnect

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This software doesn't appear notable. There are no references to no primary sources and the external links aren't all directly relevant to the topic. Shadowjams (talk) 10:35, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 21:10, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No attempt to demonstrate WP:NOTABILITY has been made, IMHO might even qualify for CSD. Ipsign (talk) 15:43, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for raising these questions. Let me address them by revising the page. TReidLewis (talk) 10:18, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.