Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ari Laptev

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz ^Humbug! 08:34, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ari Laptev

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not provide enough context or background that suffices WP:GNG, also he fails the academic specific guideline, all his background resumes to ONE:EVENT a university teacher whom had a major in another country, in a uncommon scientific field that was president of the euro mathematical society and was awarded by the Wolfson Research Institute. Also I should mention that notability is not inherited. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 21:04, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Ahem, surely the article does? Mathsfreak (talk) 21:25, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The Royal Society award would be enough to give notability. The maths society is borderline, but combined there's not doubt about notability. The article needs rewriting and references.--Dmol (talk) 22:46, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Easily notable. --bender235 (talk) 18:00, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:13, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Good GS cites in low cited field. President of European Mathematical Society. Nominator is advised to read WP:Prof before making further nominations in this area. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:58, 14 May 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Keep: Presidencies of Swedish and then European Maths Socs would seem to me to easily meet our WP:Prof requirments. (Msrasnw (talk) 10:23, 15 May 2011 (UTC))[reply]
Keep. As President of the European Mathematical Society and of the Swedish Mathematical Society, passes WP:PROF#C6. Nsk92 (talk) 13:19, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Snow Keep Nominator is requested to withdraw the nomination, rather than letting his error stand in this case. Ray^Talk 05:43, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.