Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ariane flight VA254

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:57, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ariane flight VA254

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested blank-and-redirect to List of Ariane launches (2020–2029)#2021. This isn't a particularly notable launch, there's no information other than the statistical information (including the manifest) which is better presented as part of a list. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 00:01, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 00:01, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:45, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: This article is part of a series being built, deleting it would be inconsistent. I disagree that there is no information in the article, I would rather say that it is concise. Moreover, it is still a sub, could be elaborated, and hasn't reached maturity yet. I also disagree that the article is not notable, several sources (including established international newspapers) have published articles about it. I would suggest further editing rather than deleting. benrem (talk) 23:32, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:55, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral there are sources which suggest there is some independent notability but equally the information presented here would be suitable for the list article, as suggested by the nom. Polyamorph (talk) 10:54, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bold third relist for additional participation.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 10:27, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per benrem. ~Junedude433 (talk) 04:12, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.