Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arising to Serve

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. This does not preclude the creation of a redirect at this title. Hut 8.5 21:20, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arising to Serve

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Source searches have not provided any significant coverage for this film; does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NFOE. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:58, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:58, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:58, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Dawn Breakers International Film Festival's section for 2009. I, too, can not easily find anything that attests to notability, and as another Bahai outlet, I doubt the film festival can be considered sufficiently independent of the film. Jclemens (talk) 06:15, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and then Redirect as there's still nothing actually convincing this can ever be improved and salvaged as its own article. Linking as a likely search is enough. SwisterTwister talk 06:38, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yellow Dingo (talk) 06:46, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:27, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: appears to be a promotional article on a non-notable subject. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:33, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom. Aust331 (talk) 09:43, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.