Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arkillo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Sinestro Corps. RL0919 (talk) 15:37, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Arkillo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Time to flood AfD even more because of staunch inclusionism. Non-notable fictional character, all primary references. TTN (talk) 14:54, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 14:54, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 14:54, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no real world notability, fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:38, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Sinestro Corps, which has plenty of info on the character. Argento Surfer (talk) 17:59, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy merge Thanks to you-know-who for continuing to waste people's time, but since most of these were created over a decade ago yet still can't garner independent sources of substance, I'd hope you wouldn't encounter too much resistance to the classic ATDs of redirect and selective WP:BOLD merge just mentioning range of appearances. Reywas92^Talk 19:28, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You'd think so, but I must have BOLD merged at least a few hundred trivial fictional characters a few years ago. The grand majority were slowly reverted over the years, so there is little chance any process outside of AfD can produce a mostly permanent result. Besides that, I do feel deletion and a new redirect are the best choice for most of these characters anyway. TTN (talk) 19:48, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Sinestro Corps. The character has no real-world notability demonstrated in any reliable sources. Coverage in non-primary sources is pretty much limited to plot information and comic book recaps. The character's information is already present on the main "Sinestro Corps" article, and as there is no non-primary sourced information in this article, there is nothing worth merging. Rorshacma (talk) 20:10, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Sinestro Corps per the above. Aoba47 (talk) 17:33, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.