Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armada (company)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:05, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Armada (company)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Non-notable company. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 06:08, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:14, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It is a notable company, one of the larger ski manufacturers. Article has sources other than main website, it does need some work, but that shouldn't be why it should be deleted. --Funandtrvl (talk) 17:41, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Per WP:GNG and WP:NRVE. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:14, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Der yck C. 14:51, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 07:36, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- the article is covered enough by secondary sources to meet WP:GNG and ought to be kept. Ducknish (talk) 22:21, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.