Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armando González (kickboxer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:50, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Armando González (kickboxer)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged since February, doesn't look notable, looks promotional, checking the history, it was already moved to draft space by an admin but moved to mainspace again by the blocked sock without a draft review Tehonk (talk) 22:35, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Sportspeople, Costa Rica, and Florida. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:16, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:02, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Can’t find in-depth SIGCOV coverage from reliable sources of him as a fighter or businessman. Doesn’t seem to meet general notability guidelines or WP:BIO. Lewolka (talk) 12:20, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't meet WP:GNG or sports notability criteria.Lethweimaster (talk) 21:50, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Didn't find significant independent coverage in reliable sources. Some of the article's references don't even mention his name. Winning a Florida MMA promotion of the year award doesn't show WP notability. That's especially true when the fightingnews.com "about us" page says the site "writes fight previews, blogs, and promote bouts." Hardly independent and not much editorial expertise when the article says "he excepts his award" instead of accepts. Papaursa (talk) 23:29, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:43, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.