Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/As It Is (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Nakon 01:32, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As It Is (band)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that they meet WP:NBAND or WP:GNG. Possibly worth a redirect to Fearless Records. Boleyn (talk) 10:29, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:34, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:34, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Fearless Records? As for now the band isn't significant for WP but when the album is out in April this band may. So delete it for now and push it to the authors user page for updates. --Goroth (talk) 20:39, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Alternative Press[1], Kerrang[2], and Rocksound[3] have each posted several stories about this band (and AbsolutePunk[4] if it counts). — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 12:22, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Changing from Keep to Comment for now, I'm not sure if this satisfies any of the criteria in WP:BAND, specifically if any of the stories are more than "[w]orks consisting merely of trivial coverage, such as articles that simply report performance dates, release information or track listings, or the publications of contact and booking details in directories." — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 12:31, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- In case we go for delete I'd vote for redirecting it to Fearless Records so it'd be easy for anyone to recover after the album comes out and (if) the band receives extra notability. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 12:32, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Wow, this AfD doesn't seem to be going anywhere. I suggest we go with Keep. Rocksound says here that they've got a "huuuuge review of the album (and check out an equally big illustration of the band) in our new issue." It's a print issue which I've never seen but I assume they're telling the truth and the review is "huuuuge". That plus the other coverage that I linked above, might prove enough notability. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 16:04, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:27, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 05:08, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.