Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Hames

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). Of note is that a merge discussion can continue on a talk page, if desired. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:16, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ashley Hames

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Well the link that was here earlier was long dead. Looked him up on the IMDB and seems to be only part of some obscure hosting jobs. Can't quite find notability to be honest Wgolf (talk) 00:57, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:27, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:27, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:12, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. This looks like a delete but tv celebs sometimes have hard to find refs, I'll reconsider if someone comes up with a decent ref. 19:18, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Change vote, based upon sources found. I was still a bit unconvinced until I googled to see what he looks like, and I thought OH OK I know him now. He appears here or there as minor tv celebs are liable and passes GNG in my opinion. Szzuk (talk) 16:41, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 03:52, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 12:59, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep or partial Merge to Man's Work. Looking through Highbeam, [1], "Sending a Boy to Do a Man's Job; Screen Detective" from the Sunday Mail has signficant coverage of him in the series " Man's Work", also [2]. I'd also note [3] and [4] as interview pieces. But given that all the coverage I've seen really relates to Man's Work, a redirect/merge there might be warranted. Couldn't find any reliable reviews for his book. --j⚛e decker ^talk 13:25, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment-I now think either a redirect or a merge be the best. Wgolf (talk) 16:47, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.