Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atlantic Records discography (2nd nomination)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (per consensus, NAC). American Eagle (talk) 21:30, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Atlantic Records discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Horribly incomplete list, will become insanely long. I see no purpose in trying to maintain a list of this sort, and obviously nobody gives a rip about maintaining it because it's still been unchanged since November. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:41, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete. Good god.... this would be long if completed. And the longer it gets, the more it becomes simply a list and not an interesting entry. Hairhorn (talk) 21:01, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It's an encyclopedic topic and there's no time limit on fixing it.--Michig (talk) 12:47, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Atlantic is surely one of the ten most significant labels in U.S. music history; there are many lesser labels with pages like this. What has changed about the article's premise since the first AfD was floated?Nostrildamus (talk) 14:58, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 05:29, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. There are plenty of articles just like this that just as notable, so there's no reason to delete. The fact that the article is poorly managed is a completely different matter. — Σxplicit 20:48, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.