Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atma Rama Ananda Ramana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Owen× ☎ 20:47, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Atma Rama Ananda Ramana

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

How does a college short film that is screened at its own parent company's film festival yield notability? Annapurna College of Film and Media is owned by the same people as Annapurna Studios. The only reliable source is The Hindu which talks about four other short films too, not just this film. The Telugucinema.com source is about the festival and not the film. All other sources are unreliable (not listed as such at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#Guidelines_on_sources because there are so many unreliable sources that exist and not possible to list all of them. tollywoodbuzz.com has the same reliability as Tracktollywood.com or Tollywood.net.

I genuinely feel that this article was created by [1] to have an extra link at PVR Raja. DareshMohan (talk) 19:06, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:13, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:NFILM. Only two reliable sources, The Hindu and telugucinema and rest all are unreliable. The Hindu source has no significant coverage on the short film and telugucinema is about the school that created the short film. Short film is not notable. Redirect to the school page was considered but the school page is poor with only 1 source that has no notability and significant coverage. RangersRus (talk) 13:57, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Non-notable student film; the only coverage to be found is already used in the article. These aren't sufficient to show notability; one is minimal and the other appears related to the subject. Oaktree b (talk) 19:42, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.