Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aurelio F. Rodriguez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:27, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aurelio F. Rodriguez

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been tagged for several years but despite being given this ample time it still fails to assert notability under WP:BIO. Wavehunter (talk) 09:22, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 May 20. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 00:01, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Del. No claim to notability WP:A7 --Mr. Guye (talk) 01:11, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also fails WP:NMODEL because he fails all criteria:

Entertainers

Actors, voice actors, comedians, opinion makers, models, and celebrities:

Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following.

Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment

Subject lacks all crit as previously stated

 --Mr. Guye (talk) 01:22, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I do not know if he is actually notable, but as the owner of what may be a notable venue, there is at least a reasonable indication of importance, so speedy deletion is not applicable. I removed the a7 tag. DGG ( talk ) 03:12, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:12, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:12, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 04:46, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.